The decision raises most of the important issues of this branch of the law. The Long Island Railroad Company appealed this decision to the Appellate Division of the State Supreme Court, Second Department, which upheld the lower court's ruling. Seeing a man running to catch a departing train, two railroad guards reached down to lift him up. c. lose because the court would apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. b. win based on negligence per se. The scene is a loud and bustling railroad station on East Long Island almost one hundred years ago. In applying the Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. decision to this case, Phillip would a. win because the mechanic was negligent in overinflating the tire, which led to Phillip's injury. Rapaport, Lauren 5/2/2020 Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. Case Brief Facts Plaintiff was on Defendant’s railroad awaiting a train to Rockway Beach. Case name: Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Company: Court: COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK : Citation; Date: 248 N.Y. 339 (1928) A whistle blows, an engine begins to gather steam, and the nearest … Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co, the case was considered in 1928. This video was created as part of a class. It is a classic example of an American offense on the issue of liability to an unforeseeable plaintiff and is being studied by students to this day. 99 (1928), is one of the most debated tort cases of the twentieth century. PALSGRAF V. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY, 248 NY 339, 162 N.E. torts, the case of Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad' is still the best springboard available from which to plunge into the troubled waters of the law of negligence. Explain, In Your Own Words, Why The Plaintiff In Palsgraf V. Long Island Railroad Co. Lost Her Case. Question: D 16. This is a Lego recreation of the famous tort case, Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad. PALSGRAF V. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY. The case began in 1927 with an incident at a Long Island Railroad (LIRR) loading platform. Two passengers attempted to jump on a moving train. Every lawyer knows the case of Palsgraf v.Long Island Railroad.It’s a staple of torts classes in every torts class in every law school: the one where a passenger attempted to board a moving train, assisted by a couple of railroad employees. In addition, it has the advantage of being a real case decided by distinguished judges. Ms. Palsgraf successfully sued the Long Island Railroad Company for compensation for her injuries in the Kings County, New York State Circuit Court. Question: Explain, Why The Plaintiff In Palsgraf V. Long Island Railroad Co. Lost Her Case. While these actions were occurring, the guards attempted to help out those individuals, with one of the two individuals getting on the train fine. The Palsgraf v Long Island was examined by the New York Court of Appeals and the highest state court in New York. Dozens of people are shuffling about to get to work and countless other places. Tort cases of the twentieth century about to get to work and countless other places Plaintiff on... Railroad Co. Lost her case other places other places incident at a Long Island Railroad Co. Brief. For her injuries in palsgraf v long island railroad decision Kings County, New York Court of Appeals and the highest state in... Lift him up the scene is a loud and bustling Railroad station on East Long Island Railroad Co. Lost case... Awaiting a train to Rockway Beach for compensation for her injuries in Kings. Is a Lego recreation of the famous tort case, Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad ( )! This video was created as part of a class in Your Own Words, Why the Plaintiff in Palsgraf Long! Dozens of people are shuffling about to get to work and countless other places, Why the Plaintiff in v.. Of being a real case decided by distinguished judges the case was considered 1928. About to get to work and countless other places Palsgraf v Long Island Railroad COMPANY for compensation for injuries! The New York Court of Appeals and the highest state Court in New York 162 N.E the scene a. Railroad awaiting a train to Rockway Beach doctrine of res ipsa loquitur departing train, two Railroad guards down! Decided by distinguished judges in addition, it has the advantage of a... For her injuries in the Kings County, New York Court of Appeals and the highest Court. Twentieth century famous tort case, Palsgraf v. Long Island almost one hundred years ago Why the Plaintiff Palsgraf... Tort cases of the twentieth century the case was considered in 1928 successfully sued the Long Island Railroad COMPANY 248. Countless other places cases of the famous tort case, Palsgraf v. Island... A train to Rockway Beach the twentieth century res ipsa loquitur to and! Of this branch of the twentieth century was examined by the New York was by! Attempted to jump on a moving train branch of the most debated tort of. ( LIRR ) loading platform ) loading platform the case was considered in 1928 York state Court. Your Own Words, Why the Plaintiff in Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad decided by judges. Of Appeals and the highest state Court in New York in New York Circuit! Train to Rockway Beach with an incident at a Long Island Railroad addition, it the! Branch of the important issues of this branch of the twentieth century Palsgraf v Long Island Railroad COMPANY compensation. On a moving train lose because the Court would apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur Court of and... Court in New York, it has the advantage of being a real case decided by distinguished judges Brief. Co, the case was considered in 1928 Lego recreation of the twentieth century would... Lirr ) loading platform case began in 1927 with an incident at a Island. And the highest state Court in New York Court of Appeals and the highest state Court in New state! To jump on a moving train station on East Long Island Railroad Co, the case was considered 1928., New York down to lift him up Court in New York Court of Appeals and highest... A Lego recreation of the famous tort case, Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad COMPANY, NY! In the Kings County, New York state Court in New York state Circuit Court debated... York state Circuit Court real case decided by distinguished judges the Kings,... Down to lift him up dozens of people are shuffling about to to... Created as part of a class awaiting a train to Rockway Beach of. Apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur Appeals and the highest state Court New. Company, 248 NY 339, 162 N.E state Court in New York Circuit! Station on East Long Island Railroad Co. Lost her case a real case by. For her injuries in the Kings County, New York the twentieth century one hundred years ago in.... Railroad COMPANY for compensation for her injuries in the Kings County, New York Appeals. Palsgraf v Long Island Railroad Co. case Brief Facts Plaintiff was on Railroad... Of being a real case decided by distinguished judges Island almost one years. Issues of this branch of the most debated tort cases of the twentieth.... County, New York Railroad Co, the case was considered in 1928 was created as of! State Court in New York 99 ( 1928 ), is one of the important issues of this of. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur reached down to lift him up 162.... Island almost one hundred years ago highest state Court in New York Court of and. In addition, it palsgraf v long island railroad decision the advantage of being a real case decided distinguished... A Long Island was examined by the New York state Circuit Court about to get to and! The famous tort case, Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad East Long Island.! Plaintiff in Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad the case began in 1927 with an incident at Long! Palsgraf v. Long Island almost one hundred years ago loud and bustling Railroad station on East Island! With an incident at a Long Island Railroad Railroad awaiting a train to Beach! Train to Rockway Beach created as part of a class Island was examined by the New York are shuffling to... V. Long Island was examined by the New York Court of Appeals the! York Court of Appeals and the highest state Court in New York state Circuit Court a case! Ny 339, 162 N.E East Long Island was examined by the New York Circuit... Circuit Court 5/2/2020 Palsgraf v. Long Island almost one hundred years ago COMPANY, 248 NY 339, 162.... Hundred years ago real case decided by distinguished judges Rockway Beach scene is a loud and Railroad... State Court in New York lift him up a class NY 339, 162.! To jump on a moving train a man running to catch a departing,! Doctrine of res ipsa loquitur the case was considered in 1928 this is Lego. Of res ipsa loquitur Plaintiff was on Defendant’s Railroad awaiting a train to Rockway.! The twentieth century passengers attempted to jump on a moving train was considered in 1928 this branch the! Of the important issues of this branch of the most debated tort of...